Gapsy Studio vs UX studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of UX studio (4.3/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. UX studio is the stronger option for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs UX studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Budapest, Hungary |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 60–71 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. | B2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Dovetail, Maze |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | SaaS / B2B software |
Gapsy Studio vs UX studio: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) back its work across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
UX studio
David Pasztor founded UX studio (uxstudioteam.com) in 2013 in Budapest, Hungary, where it reports 60–71 employees depending on source. The company leads with research, focused on B2B SaaS teams simplifying complex products — a discovery-heavy methodology that offers a genuinely comparable reference point to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign, Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs UX studio: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| UX studio | |
|---|---|
| + | A genuine research-first specialty, evidenced by the company's own published case studies, not just marketing copy |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operation (since 2013) under its founding team |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B SaaS, giving real depth in untangling complex product workflows |
| + | 60–71 person team is large enough for multi-workstream engagements while staying boutique in culture |
| - | Exclusive B2B SaaS focus means less fit for consumer, healthcare, or fintech-specific projects |
| - | The research-first approach can extend project timelines for clients wanting to move straight to UI |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option here |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose UX studio?
UX studio is the right choice for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins..
A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | UX studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs UX studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
UX studio (4.3/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins.. If your situation matches those criteria, UX studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs UX studio FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than UX studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. UX studio is better for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins..
How do Gapsy Studio and UX studio differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). UX studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or UX studio?
UX studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and UX studio?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. UX studio's primary differentiator is: a research-first methodology comparable in rigor to phenomenon studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex b2b saas products. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 60–71), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.