Work & Co vs Qubstudio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.9/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign.. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team |
| Team size | 425+ | 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | Premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering. | Fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Sketch, Webflow |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: overview
Work & Co
Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo started Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn in May 2013; today it runs offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. Its client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, Disney — is exceptional for a 425-person company, reflecting an engineering-heavy model where design and front-end build happen inside the same team. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing.
Qubstudio
Qubstudio traces to around 2006 (some sources say 2007), headquartered in London's Canary Wharf with a Ukraine-based delivery team. The company describes roughly 70 creative professionals within a broader 51–200 employee band. Clutch's 2026 rankings place it #1 among UX/UI companies with 90+ reviews, and Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition back that up. Work spans fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech, from new MVPs through enterprise-scale redesigns.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Capability | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Criterion | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Dimension | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to headcount |
| + | Design and engineering under one roof cuts the hand-off risk of splitting vendors |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give real multi-region capacity |
| + | Consistent record shipping flagship consumer digital products |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, which shares a parent with the Accenture Song entry elsewhere in this list |
| - | A premium client base implies premium pricing even without a published minimum |
| - | Less vertical specialization (fintech, healthcare-specific) than boutiques built around one niche |
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | #1 UX/UI company on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews |
| + | Independently verified via Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition |
| + | Nearly two decades of operation with a stable London HQ and Ukraine delivery team |
| + | Covers everything from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated as approximate |
| - | Ukraine-based delivery team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted companies |
| - | The 51–200 directory band is wide; the company's own ~70 figure is more precise but self-reported |
Who should choose Work & Co?
Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering..
An engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the right choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
#1 UX/UI company on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Qubstudio ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Qubstudio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Fintech MVP launch design | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
Qubstudio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. #1 UX/UI company on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. It is best for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
Work & Co (3.9/5) is the better choice when premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. If your situation matches those criteria, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Qubstudio FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Qubstudio?
Qubstudio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. Qubstudio is better for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
How do Work & Co and Qubstudio differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Qubstudio?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) unusually strong for its headcount. Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: #1 ux/ui company on clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with red dot design award recognition on top. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Financial services / fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.