Clay vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.0/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. Clay is the stronger option for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list. | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Clay vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global) operates out of San Francisco with substantial NYC client history. No founding year is published, so it's tagged here as unconfirmed; team size is likewise not independently verifiable — best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Its roster — Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, Samsung — reflects deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. This is the design company at clay.global, distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company also named Clay (clay.com).
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) back its work across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a boutique-to-mid-size company |
| + | Deep, specific track record across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with strong NYC client relationships |
| + | Combines UX design, branding, and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed outside the company's own materials |
| - | Team size is neither published nor independently verifiable, complicating capacity planning for large programs |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) — confirm you're researching clay.global |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list..
A client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Clay fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
Clay (4.0/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list.. If your situation matches those criteria, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Clay better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list.. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
How do Clay and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and Gapsy Studio?
Clay's primary differentiator is: a client list (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.